Definition: Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Documentation
Source: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022
Source reference: https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html
Additional information: This ADR documents decisions regarding the documentation practices for the software system. It includes decisions on the types of documentation to be maintained (e.g., system architecture, API documentation, user guides), tools to be used for documentation, and guidelines for keeping documentation up to date.
Example: Title: Documentation Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
LOST view: Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/dr8/egovera/DocumentationGoal
EIRA traceability: eira:DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal
ABB name: egovera:DocumentationGoal
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
Last modification: 2023-07-06
dct:identifier: ADR-20230606091024761
dct:title: Architecture Decision Record about Documentation
eira:adr_context: The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons.
eira:adr_decision: The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how.
eira:adr_status: [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)]
eira:adr_consecuences: The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture.
|
|
dct:modified | 2024-01-28 |
dct:identifier | ADR-20230606091024761 |
dct:title | Architecture Decision Record about Documentation |
skos:example | Title: Documentation Architecture Decision Record (ADR) |
eira:adr_context | The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons. |
eira:adr_decision | The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how. |
eira:adr_status | [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)] |
eira:adr_consecuences | The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture. |
eira:concept | eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock |
eira:definitionSource | ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022 |
eira:definitionSourceReference | https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html |
skos:note | This ADR documents decisions regarding the documentation practices for the software system. It includes decisions on the types of documentation to be maintained (e.g., system architecture, API documentation, user guides), tools to be used for documentation, and guidelines for keeping documentation up to date. |
eira:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/dr8/DocumentationGoal |
dct:type | eira:DocumentationGoal |
skos:definition | Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Documentation |
eira:view | Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view |
eira:eifLayer | N/A |
skos:broader | http://data.europa.eu/dr8/DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal |