Definition: Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Integration Thrid-Party Systems Source: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022 Source reference: https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html Additional information: Integration of third-party systems is a decision that involves the integration of external systems with the organization's existing IT infrastructure. This decision is essential to ensure that the organization's systems can communicate and share data with external systems, such as vendors, partners, and customers. The integration of third-party systems can improve the efficiency of business processes, reduce costs, and enhance the overall customer experience. However, it also requires careful planning and consideration of security, data privacy, and compliance requirements. The IT architecture team must evaluate the compatibility of the third-party systems with the existing infrastructure, assess the risks associated with the integration, and develop a robust integration strategy that aligns with the organization's business goals and objectives. Example: Integration with Third-Party Systems: Decision: Integrating the software system with popular customer relationship management (CRM) platforms. Rationale: Integrating with widely used CRM systems allows for seamless data exchange, better customer insights, and improved customer relationship management for the organization. LOST view: Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/dr8/egovera/IntegrationThrid-PartySystemsGoal EIRA traceability: eira:DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal ABB name: egovera:IntegrationThrid-PartySystemsGoal EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock Last modification: 2023-06-15 dct:identifier: ADR-20230515180947744 dct:title: Architecture Decision Record about Integration Thrid-Party Systems eira:adr_context: The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons. eira:adr_decision: The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how. eira:adr_status: [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)] eira:adr_consecuences: The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture.