Definition: Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Microservices Architecture
Source: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022
Source reference: https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html
Additional information: Microservices architecture decomposes an application into smaller, loosely coupled services. Each service is responsible for a specific functionality and can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently. Services communicate with each other through lightweight APIs or messaging protocols. This architecture enables flexibility, scalability, and easier maintenance, but it introduces complexities in managing distributed systems.
Example: Title: Microservices Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
LOST view: Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/dr8/egovera/MicroserviceArchitectureGoal
EIRA traceability: eira:DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal
ABB name: egovera:MicroserviceArchitectureGoal
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
Last modification: 2023-08-20
dct:identifier: http://data.europa.eu/dr8/egovera/MicroserviceArchitectureGoal
dct:title: Architecture Decision Record about Microservices Architecture
eira:adr_context: The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons.
eira:adr_decision: The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how.
eira:adr_status: [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)]
eira:adr_consecuences: The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture.
|
|
dct:modified | 2024-01-28 |
dct:identifier | http://data.europa.eu/dr8/MicroserviceArchitectureGoal |
dct:title | Architecture Decision Record about Microservices Architecture |
skos:example | Title: Microservices Architecture Decision Record (ADR) |
eira:adr_context | The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons. |
eira:adr_decision | The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how. |
eira:adr_status | [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)] |
eira:adr_consecuences | The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture. |
eira:concept | eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock |
eira:definitionSource | ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022 |
eira:definitionSourceReference | https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html |
skos:note | Microservices architecture decomposes an application into smaller, loosely coupled services. Each service is responsible for a specific functionality and can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently. Services communicate with each other through lightweight APIs or messaging protocols. This architecture enables flexibility, scalability, and easier maintenance, but it introduces complexities in managing distributed systems. |
eira:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/dr8/MicroserviceArchitectureGoal |
dct:type | eira:MicroserviceArchitectureGoal |
skos:definition | Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Microservices Architecture |
eira:view | Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view |
eira:eifLayer | N/A |
skos:broader | http://data.europa.eu/dr8/DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal |