Definition: Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Replaceability
Source: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022
Source reference: https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html
Additional information: Replaceability in software architecture refers to the design and characteristics of a software system that enable individual components or modules to be easily replaced or substituted without significant impact on the overall functionality or integrity of the system. An architecture that supports replaceability allows for seamless replacement of components to accommodate evolving requirements, technology advancements, or business needs.
Example: Title: Replaceability Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
LOST view: Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/dr8/egovera/ReplaceabilityGoal
EIRA traceability: eira:DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal
ABB name: egovera:ReplaceabilityGoal
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
Last modification: 2023-07-06
dct:identifier: ADR-20230606091024772
dct:title: Architecture Decision Record about Replaceability
eira:adr_context: The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons.
eira:adr_decision: The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how.
eira:adr_status: [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)]
eira:adr_consecuences: The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture.
|
|
dct:modified | 2024-01-28 |
dct:identifier | ADR-20230606091024772 |
dct:title | Architecture Decision Record about Replaceability |
skos:example | Title: Replaceability Architecture Decision Record (ADR) |
eira:adr_context | The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons. |
eira:adr_decision | The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how. |
eira:adr_status | [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)] |
eira:adr_consecuences | The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture. |
eira:concept | eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock |
eira:definitionSource | ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022 |
eira:definitionSourceReference | https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html |
skos:note | Replaceability in software architecture refers to the design and characteristics of a software system that enable individual components or modules to be easily replaced or substituted without significant impact on the overall functionality or integrity of the system. An architecture that supports replaceability allows for seamless replacement of components to accommodate evolving requirements, technology advancements, or business needs. |
eira:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/dr8/ReplaceabilityGoal |
dct:type | eira:ReplaceabilityGoal |
skos:definition | Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Replaceability |
eira:view | Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view |
eira:eifLayer | N/A |
skos:broader | http://data.europa.eu/dr8/DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal |